Utilize our Tolling Agreement to mutually suspend certain rights, regulations, or claims while navigating a legal dispute with another party.
Select your state below to find a Free Tolling Agreement Template
Employ a tolling agreement, alternatively referred to as a standstill agreement, to "toll" or temporarily halt the progression of a time-based statute that may apply to a claim. This agreement's purpose, suitable situations for its use, and access to a tolling agreement template are provided below.
A Tolling Agreement, often known as a standstill agreement, is a formal arrangement between two or more parties involved in a current or potential lawsuit. In this agreement, the parties decide to "toll" or temporarily suspend specific rights, rules, or claims that typically govern legal actions. These rights, rules, and claims often include the statute of limitations and the statute of repose.
The Tolling Agreement serves the following purposes:
It's important to note that entering into a tolling agreement doesn't imply guilt, responsibility, or liability. It also doesn't waive a valid claim related to the statute of limitations or the statute of repose before the agreement takes effect. The sole right affected by a tolling agreement is the party's ability to argue that too much time has passed during the tolling period for a lawsuit to proceed.
Tolling agreements offer several advantages that make them a valuable consideration in various situations. Here are some common reasons for proposing a tolling agreement:
The statute of limitations dictates when a claim can be filed following an alleged offense, encompassing various legal actions like debt collection, medical malpractice lawsuits, and contract disputes. These timeframes can vary significantly by state, leading to ambiguity for many involved in litigation regarding when the statute of limitations starts.
Typically, the statute of limitations commences when an individual becomes aware or should have become aware of their legal claim. Consider a scenario involving a foreign object inadvertently left inside a patient during a medical procedure. Does the statute of limitations begin when the patient first experiences pain from the object, when an infection develops, when they should have consulted a doctor, or when they actually visited a doctor?
Through a tolling agreement, parties eliminate disputes over the precise "end date" of specific claims and rights, sidestepping the risk of an unfavorable court ruling. Instead, they can concentrate on assessing the merits (or lack thereof) of a potential lawsuit and collaborate toward a potential resolution.
Importantly, tolling agreements do not waive valid arguments concerning a statute of limitations or repose that has already expired; they pertain solely to those within the tolling period.
A tolling agreement serves as a comprehensive document that not only suspends the statute of limitations and the statute of repose but also defines a crucial "end date." This agreement entails both parties mutually waiving the statute of limitations and statute of repose, specifying that no lawsuit will be initiated beyond a predetermined date or condition.
This waiver serves multiple purposes:
Plaintiffs gain an advantage by extending their timeline to investigate and accumulate evidence supporting their claims. Without a tolling agreement and sufficient factual support for a valid claim before the statute of limitations expires, a plaintiff risks losing the opportunity to file a lawsuit.
Defendants often prefer to settle disputes privately, avoiding public court filings that can harm their reputation or business. By endorsing a tolling agreement, defendants can pursue confidential settlements without initiating legal action. In some cases, plaintiffs may need to file a lawsuit to safeguard their claim without a tolling agreement.
Co-defendants may employ tolling agreements, particularly when addressing counterclaims like cross-claims and third-party claims. Before pursuing a counterclaim against a co-defendant, parties may wish to assess the plaintiff's case's strength and potential liability.
Tolling agreements introduce a negotiation deadline before formal legal proceedings can be initiated, encouraging both parties to explore out-of-court settlements. These agreements help circumvent the escalating expenses associated with litigation, from hiring litigation attorneys to filing counterclaims. In some cases, disputes may be resolved through arbitration, offering a cost-effective alternative to court proceedings.
Tolling agreements specify the duration of the suspension of the statute of limitations, providing parties with additional time to evaluate their positions and explore dispute resolution options. Defendants can use this time to develop a defense or negotiate privately, while plaintiffs can assess the strengths and weaknesses of their claims.
A comprehensive tolling agreement typically encompasses the following key elements:
The ramifications of not utilizing a tolling agreement can vary for plaintiffs and defendants:
For Plaintiffs:
For Defendants:
Recap of Consequences:
There are two key scenarios in which you should contemplate the utilization of a tolling agreement:
Additional Situations for Tolling Agreements:
For plaintiffs, a tolling agreement is prudent when the statute of limitations or repose might impact their claim's viability. Likewise, defendants may find value in tolling agreements to safeguard against potential defense challenges arising from timing issues and to facilitate claim settlement negotiations.
A contractual arrangement where a designated quantity of raw material is processed through a specific processing facility during defined periods. For instance, an agreement to convert a set amount of alumina into aluminum at a particular aluminum plant.
Another prevalent commercial structure utilized by U.S. LNG export facilities involves the terminal operator exclusively liquefying gas on behalf of those holding interests in its production units. The majority of U.S. facilities, excluding those owned by Cheniere Energy Inc., operate under this framework.
Page 1 of