Discover everything you need to know about voidable contracts in this comprehensive guide. Learn what voidable contracts are, how they differ from void contracts, common reasons for voidability, real-life examples, and more.
Start taking digital signatures with BoloSign and save money.
Contracts serve as the backbone of many professional and personal interactions by clearly outlining the terms and conditions agreed upon by the involved parties. They are legally binding and are designed to provide clarity and security to relationships, whether in business or personal life.
However, there are instances when contracts can be disputed or deemed voidable due to various circumstances. This guide will explore the concept of voidable contracts, including what makes a contract voidable, and under what conditions they can be annulled, and will provide examples to illustrate these situations.
Important takeaways:
A voidable contract is a legally binding agreement between two or more parties that is susceptible to being declared invalid or void under certain circumstances. Unlike void contracts, which are inherently unenforceable from the beginning due to their nature (such as an illegal agreement), voidable contracts are initially valid but can be voided at the option of one or more parties involved.
Factors that may render a contract voidable include misrepresentation, fraud, undue influence, coercion, incapacity, or a mistake. If a party chooses to exercise their right to void the contract, they can typically do so by notifying the other party and seeking to undo the agreement.
The main difference between void and voidable contracts lies in their enforceability and the circumstances under which they can be invalidated:
In summary, a void contract is inherently unenforceable, while a voidable contract is initially enforceable but can be voided under specific conditions.
Contracts can be voided for a variety of reasons, including misrepresentation, fraud, undue influence, coercion, mistake, lack of capacity, illegality, unconscionability, duress, and mutual agreement. Misrepresentation involves false statements or omissions that lead one party to enter the contract. Fraud entails intentional deception for unlawful gain. Undue influence occurs when one party exerts excessive pressure, while coercion involves threats or force. Mistakes in understanding key contract elements may render it voidable, as can agreements made by parties lacking capacity or engaging in illegal activities. Contracts violating public policy or deemed unconscionable can also be voided.
A contract is considered voidable when certain conditions exist that give one or more parties the right to invalidate or void the contract if they choose to do so. These conditions typically involve factors that undermine the voluntary and informed consent of the parties at the time of contract formation. Examples of circumstances that can make a contract voidable include misrepresentation, fraud, undue influence, coercion, mistake, lack of capacity, illegality, unconscionability, duress, and mutual agreement. If any of these factors are present and a party decides to exercise their right to void the contract, they can typically do so by notifying the other party and seeking to undo the agreement.
Voidance of a contract can occur for various reasons, including:
Misrepresentation or Fraud:
Misrepresentation occurs when one party provides false information or conceals material facts, leading the other party to enter the contract under false pretenses. Fraud involves intentional deception to secure an unfair advantage, often through false statements or misleading conduct. In both cases, the deceived party may have the right to void the contract due to the lack of genuine consent.
Undue Influence:
Undue influence occurs when one party exerts significant pressure or influence over the other, exploiting a position of trust, authority, or confidence to manipulate the terms of the contract to their advantage. This imbalance of power can undermine the voluntariness of the agreement, rendering it voidable at the option of the influenced party.
Duress or Coercion:
Duress or coercion involves the use of threats, intimidation, or force to compel someone to enter into a contract against their will. When one party is coerced into agreement due to fear of harm or loss, the contract is considered voidable. The coerced party has the right to void the contract if they can demonstrate that their consent was obtained under duress.
Mistake:
Mistake occurs when one or both parties have a misunderstanding or error regarding a fundamental aspect of the contract, such as the subject matter, terms, or key facts. If the mistake is material and undermines the parties' genuine consent, the contract may be voidable by the mistaken party.
Lack of Capacity:
Contracts entered into by individuals lacking legal capacity, such as minors, persons declared mentally incompetent, or individuals under the influence of drugs or alcohol, may be voidable. These parties may lack the legal capacity to fully understand the terms and consequences of the contract, rendering it voidable at their option.
Illegality:
Contracts that involve illegal activities or violate public policy are void and unenforceable from the outset. If the purpose or subject matter of the contract is illegal or against public policy, the contract is void ab initio (from the beginning) and cannot be enforced by either party.
Mutual Agreement:
If both parties mutually agree to terminate the contract, it can be voided by mutual consent. In such cases, the parties voluntarily decide to release each other from their contractual obligations, effectively rendering the contract voidable through mutual agreement.
Here are a few instances from real life that exemplify voidable contracts, providing a clearer understanding of the concept.
Imagine John is under severe financial strain and is struggling to make ends meet. A car dealership takes advantage of his vulnerable situation by pressuring him into signing a purchase agreement for a vehicle he can't afford.
Despite John's protests and discomfort, the salesperson uses intimidating tactics and misleading information to coerce him into the deal. As a result, John feels compelled to sign the contract against his better judgment.
In this scenario, John could potentially void the contract due to undue influence exerted upon him by the dealership.
Anna purchases a house from a real estate agent who assures her that the property is in excellent condition and has recently undergone thorough inspections with no significant issues found. Relying on this representation, Anna signs the purchase agreement and moves into the house.
However, shortly after moving in, Anna discovers serious structural problems that were concealed during the sale. It turns out that the real estate agent was aware of these issues but deliberately withheld the information to secure the sale.
The misrepresentation of the property's condition could render the contract voidable, and Anna might have grounds to rescind the contract due to fraudulent concealment of material facts by the real estate agent.
A technology store sells a gaming laptop to a 16-year-old student who presents themselves confidently and convincingly as an adult. The store, unaware of the buyer's true age, completes the sale and issues the receipt.
Shortly after purchasing the laptop, the student's parents discover the transaction and insist on returning the laptop, as they deem it inappropriate for their child and believe it was purchased without their consent.
Given that minors usually lack the legal capacity to enter into binding contracts, the store's sale contract with the student may be voidable at the discretion of the minor or their legal guardians. As a result, the store may need to accept the return of the laptop and refund the purchase price.
An aspiring artist, Jack, enters into a contract with a well-known gallery to exhibit and sell his artwork. However, Jack later discovers that the gallery misrepresented the terms of the agreement, including the commission rates and the duration of the exhibition.
Feeling deceived and taken advantage of, Jack seeks legal advice and learns that the misrepresentation by the gallery could render the contract voidable. If it can be proven that the gallery intentionally misled Jack to secure an unfair advantage, Jack may have the option to void the contract and seek alternative representation or recourse for damages.
Assess the Contract:
Seek Legal Advice
Take Prompt Action
Gather Supporting Evidence
Consider Negotiation or Mediation
File a Lawsuit if Necessary
Obtain a Court Order
Enforce the Court's Decision
Transforming a Voidable Contract into Validity: The Process of Ratification
Affirmative Action
Informed Consent
Express or Implied Ratification
Absence of Duress or Undue Influence
No New Consideration Required
Clear Intent
Time Limitations
Consider Sarah, who entered a contract with John to sell her antique piano. Discovering that John misrepresented the piano's value, initially, Sarah had the option to void the contract due to misrepresentation.
However, after deliberation, Sarah decides to uphold the contract. She notifies John of her choice to affirm the contract's terms and proceeds with the sale, fully aware of the piano's actual value.
Sarah's affirmative action, with complete knowledge of the misrepresentation, constitutes ratification, rendering the initially voidable contract valid.
BoloForms Signature recognizes the critical role of efficient management in crafting strong contracts. Our contract management solution provides a seamless and intuitive platform designed to streamline processes, bolster compliance, and mitigate risks.
Tailored to meet the needs of businesses of any scale, BoloForms Signature enables organizations to optimize workflows and foster enduring partnerships through effective contract management. Harness the capabilities of BoloForms Signature to unleash the true potential of your contracts and propel your organization toward success.
To void a document in BoloForms Signature, follow these steps:
A voidable contract is a legal agreement that is initially binding and enforceable but is subject to being voided or invalidated by one or both parties due to certain defects, such as misrepresentation, duress, undue influence, lack of capacity, or other legal grounds.
In this comprehensive guide, we've explored the key characteristics of voidable contracts, including their formation, grounds for voidability, legal implications, and the process of voiding or ratifying them.
In conclusion, By recognizing the potential for a contract to be voidable and understanding the steps involved in voiding or ratifying it, parties can make informed decisions to uphold the integrity of their contractual relationships and justice within the legal framework.
Co-Founder, BoloForms
10 May, 2024
These articles will guide you on how to simplify office work, boost your efficiency, and concentrate on expanding your business.